Claude Code reviews

4.7(3)

Write a review

Showing 1–2 of 2 reviews

Most recent Most helpful Highest rated Lowest rated

Tom B.

Engineering Manager · SaaS · 51–200 employees

5.0

August 4, 2026

“Delegating a whole ticket is a different category of tool”

Used daily for 6–12 months

I describe the change, go and review someone else's PR, and come back to a branch with passing tests. It explored parts of the codebase I had forgotten existed and matched conventions I never explained. The mental shift from "assistant" to "delegate" took about a week.

Pros

Genuine autonomy on feature-sized work. Runs the test suite without being asked and iterates on real failures.

Cons

Diffs get large. You must review properly or you are just accumulating debt faster.

Problems it solves

Small well-specified tickets now take a review pass instead of an afternoon.

David K.Validated Reviewer

CTO · SaaS · 11–50 employees

4.5

June 18, 2026

“Best on legacy code nobody remembers”

Used daily for 6–12 months

We inherited a large service with no documentation and no original authors. Pointing it at the repo and asking how the billing path works produced a better explanation than anyone on the team could have written. That alone justified the subscription.

Pros

Outstanding comprehension of unfamiliar codebases. Terminal-first means it fits our existing tooling.

Cons

Hit Pro limits regularly and moved to Max. No autocomplete, so I still run Copilot alongside.