Cursor reviews

4.8(4)

Write a review

Showing 1–2 of 2 reviews

Most recent Most helpful Highest rated Lowest rated

Tom B.

Engineering Manager · SaaS · 51–200 employees

4.5

June 24, 2026

“Rolled it out to twelve engineers, would do it again”

Used daily for 6–12 months

Migration was genuinely a ten-minute job because it is VS Code underneath — no retraining, no lost extensions. Privacy mode enforcement at the team level was what got it past our security review. The juniors improved fastest, which surprised me.

Pros

Zero migration friction. Team admin and enforced privacy mode. Shared rules keep the output consistent with our conventions.

Cons

Cost per seat climbs once you add usage. Indexing our largest repo takes a while and occasionally goes stale.

James W.Validated Reviewer

RevOps Manager · SaaS · 51–200 employees

4.5

May 20, 2026

“Good, but review discipline matters”

Used daily for 6–12 months

Agent mode will happily produce 300 lines across five files. If you accept that without reading it you are storing up trouble, and I watched a colleague do exactly that. Used in small increments with tests it is excellent. Used as a wish-granting machine it is not.

Pros

Multi-file edits with clear diffs. Runs the test suite and fixes what it broke.

Cons

Encourages large unreviewed changes if you let it. Frequent updates occasionally move things around.