Skip to content
Saaspare
Cursor logo

Cursor reviews

4.8(4)
Write a review

Marcus C.Validated Reviewer

Product Manager · SaaS · 201–1,000 employees

5.0

August 9, 2026

Six months in and it has not lost its edge

Used daily for 6–12 months

The novelty wore off and the productivity did not. Codebase indexing means new features come out matching our conventions, and the review burden is lower than with tools that write generic code I then rewrite. It is the first AI tool I would genuinely miss.

Pros

Suggestions fit our codebase rather than a tutorial. Migration from VS Code was trivial.

Cons

Usage costs still need watching on heavy weeks.

Problems it solves

Cut the time from ticket to first working draft roughly in half.

10/10 likely to recommend
Helpful?

David K.Validated Reviewer

CTO · SaaS · 11–50 employees

5.0

August 1, 2026

Tab completion is the thing you cannot give up

Used daily for 1–2 years

The agent gets the attention but the multi-line tab prediction is what changed my day. It works out what I am doing and offers the next three edits, including in files I had not opened yet. I tried going back to plain VS Code for a week and lasted two days.

Pros

Tab prediction, whole-repo context, and it actually reuses our internal helpers instead of inventing new ones.

Cons

Usage charges on top of the subscription. One heavy refactoring week cost me an extra $40 I had not budgeted.

Problems it solves

Cut the time to add a standard CRUD endpoint from about an hour to fifteen minutes.

10/10 likely to recommend
Helpful?

Tom B.

Engineering Manager · SaaS · 51–200 employees

4.5

June 24, 2026

Rolled it out to twelve engineers, would do it again

Used daily for 6–12 months

Migration was genuinely a ten-minute job because it is VS Code underneath — no retraining, no lost extensions. Privacy mode enforcement at the team level was what got it past our security review. The juniors improved fastest, which surprised me.

Pros

Zero migration friction. Team admin and enforced privacy mode. Shared rules keep the output consistent with our conventions.

Cons

Cost per seat climbs once you add usage. Indexing our largest repo takes a while and occasionally goes stale.

9/10 likely to recommend
Helpful?

James W.Validated Reviewer

RevOps Manager · SaaS · 51–200 employees

4.5

May 20, 2026

Good, but review discipline matters

Used daily for 6–12 months

Agent mode will happily produce 300 lines across five files. If you accept that without reading it you are storing up trouble, and I watched a colleague do exactly that. Used in small increments with tests it is excellent. Used as a wish-granting machine it is not.

Pros

Multi-file edits with clear diffs. Runs the test suite and fixes what it broke.

Cons

Encourages large unreviewed changes if you let it. Frequent updates occasionally move things around.

9/10 likely to recommend
Helpful?