GitHub Copilot reviews

4.2(3)

Write a review

Showing 1–3 of 3 reviews

Most recent Most helpful Highest rated Lowest rated

Aisha M.Validated Reviewer

Business Analyst · Healthcare · 1,000+ employees

4.0

July 1, 2026

“The one our security team approved without a fight”

Used daily for 1–2 years

We evaluated four tools. Copilot won on governance, not on capability — audit logs, policy management, IP indemnity and a vendor already on our approved list. For a regulated environment that is most of the decision, and the engineers are perfectly happy with it.

Pros

Mature admin controls. IP indemnity mattered to legal. Nobody had to change editor.

Cons

Our engineers who had tried Cursor say the codebase awareness is noticeably weaker.

Problems it solves

Gave 180 engineers a sanctioned assistant with an audit trail.

Ethan K.

Account Executive · SaaS · 11–50 employees

4.5

June 2, 2026

“Best value in the category at $10”

Used daily for 2+ years

It is a third the price of the alternatives and delivers well over a third of the value. For a small team watching costs that maths is hard to beat. The PR review agent catching obvious issues before a human looks is worth the fee on its own.

Pros

Price. PR review agent. Works identically across our mixed VS Code and JetBrains setup.

Cons

Premium requests run out faster than expected on Pro if you use agent mode much.

Marcus C.Validated Reviewer

Product Manager · SaaS · 201–1,000 employees

4.0

April 21, 2026

“Solid autocomplete, unremarkable agent”

Used daily for 2+ years

As a completion tool it does exactly what it says and I would not work without it. As an agent it needs more supervision than the newer tools — it loses track on anything spanning more than two or three files and produces code that ignores our internal conventions.

Pros

Reliable completions. Excellent JetBrains support, which the competition mostly ignores.

Cons

Multi-file agent work is weaker. Suggestions often ignore existing helpers in the repo.