“It cleared a backlog nobody was ever going to get to”
Used weekly for 6–12 months
Dependency bumps, flaky test fixes, small migrations — two years of accumulated chores. I fed Devin about sixty tightly written tickets over a month and merged most of what came back. It has never once solved a hard problem for me, and I no longer expect it to.
Pros
Parallel sessions are the real feature. PRs arrive in our normal review flow. Assigning from Linear feels natural.
Cons
Vague tickets waste ACUs and produce nothing. You must review everything properly.
Problems it solves
Cleared two years of deferred maintenance in about a month.
T
Tom B.
Engineering Manager · SaaS · 51–200 employees
4.0
July 14, 2026
“Much more reasonable at $20 than at $500”
Used weekly for 6–12 months
We looked at it when it was $500 a month and could not justify it. At $20 plus usage we trialled it properly and found the shape of work it is good at. That is a much better way to sell this, because you need a month to learn what to give it.
Pros
Entry price makes evaluation possible. Integrations are genuinely good.
Cons
ACU spend still needs a budget alert. A bad session bills you for the failure.
Problems it solves
Gave the team a way to offload small work without a hiring conversation.
J
James W.Validated Reviewer
RevOps Manager · SaaS · 51–200 employees
3.5
June 2, 2026
“Do not believe the autonomy story”
Used monthly for 6–12 months
It is a capable junior that needs very precise instructions and full review, not a software engineer. Used that way it is useful. Used the way the launch video implied, it will waste your money and your afternoon. Manage the expectation before you buy it for a team.
Pros
Good at small well-defined work. Asynchronous model genuinely saves attention.
Cons
Marketing oversold it badly. Review burden is unchanged.
