Surfer SEO reviews

4.3(3)

Write a review

Showing 1–3 of 3 reviews

Most recent Most helpful Highest rated Lowest rated

Amara O.Validated Reviewer

Marketing Director · E-commerce · 51–200 employees

4.5

July 14, 2026

“Fixed our freelance brief problem”

Used weekly for 1–2 years

We brief eight freelancers who are good writers and not SEOs. Sending a Surfer editor link instead of a written brief removed most of the back-and-forth, and first drafts now arrive close to publishable.

Pros

Briefs in seconds. Writers understand a score in a way they did not understand my instructions.

Cons

I have to remind people that 82 with good writing beats 95 with keyword stuffing.

Problems it solves

Cut editing time per commissioned article by roughly half.

Lucas M.

Growth Lead · SaaS · 1–10 employees

4.5

May 29, 2026

“Content audit found our quick wins”

Used weekly for 6–12 months

Pointed it at 200 existing posts and it identified thirty that were close to ranking and needed updating. That prioritised a quarter of work far better than my instincts would have.

Pros

Audit prioritisation is genuinely useful. Cheaper than the big platforms.

Cons

Article credits run out fast on Essential if you audit as well as write.

Ben C.

Freelance Consultant · Consulting · Self-employed

4.0

April 18, 2026

“Made our content worse before it made it better”

Used weekly for 1–2 years

Early on we chased scores and published things that read like a term-list. Traffic went up and conversions went down. Now we treat it as a checklist and write properly, which is what we should have done from the start.

Pros

Useful signal when used with judgement.

Cons

Very easy to misuse. The score is a model, not the algorithm.